Shout Box archive

31 May 16:26

Mechanizoid

--

Hi Rotten

31 May 16:26

RottenPocket

--

It's not that no one reads theoretical journals but that practicing artists lean towards technical study. Art history and anthropology is 95% reading scientific and philosophical papers.

31 May 16:26

Mechanizoid

--

Yeah, the real reason I asked was so that anyone watching could find the page easily. I know how to find the threads created by another user. :-)

31 May 16:17

OtherMuzz

--

Not being a lazy bastard in general is a good way to do life

31 May 16:16

Mechanizoid

--

I'm confused. If I'm gonna be a lazy bastard I shouldn't go and find it right after asking for someone else to do that work for me.

31 May 16:16

Mechanizoid

--

Thanks. Already found it though just after I asked, LMAO.

31 May 16:15

OtherMuzz

--

http://crimsondaggers.com/forum/thread-7607.html

31 May 16:14

Mechanizoid

--

Where's that thread? Link or it didn't happen! :P

31 May 16:04

OtherMuzz

--

Exactly. You can read about my thoughts on that in the fundamentals thread we had the other day

31 May 15:52

Mechanizoid

--

That makes sense, I need to make the basic drawing skills automatic so my brain can focus on the bigger picture (literally).

31 May 15:52

Mechanizoid

--

Like the mechanical skills (straight lines, ellipses, etc.)?

31 May 15:51

OtherMuzz

--

lol, yeah the only problem with that is you need to understand that your brain is a thing you need to train to do tasks automatically, which doesn't sit well with people that just want to logic everything.

31 May 15:48

Mechanizoid

--

I realized that this was all bullshit when I saw Feng Zhou. :D

31 May 15:46

Mechanizoid

--

Like, people used to tell me I should forget about drawing 'cause I'm not the "arty type". They used as evidence the fact I read so much stuff and study math and science.

31 May 15:45

Mechanizoid

--

Yes, illustrator types are. This is probably an unfair stereotype that has just been repeated to me too many times.

31 May 15:45

OtherMuzz

--

lol mech yeah

31 May 15:45

OtherMuzz

--

You'd think that, but as somebody know the science of light. most illustrators don't know jack.

31 May 15:45

Fedodika

--

maybe the fine arty people are more inclined to like images and stuff but most illustrator types are cold bone logical folks

31 May 15:45

Mechanizoid

--

What is ever worse is when you get a scientist willing to pander to such reporting to circumvent peer review that would shoot down their shoddy research.

31 May 15:44

OtherMuzz

--

I just use it to get ideas about what studies to look at.

31 May 15:44

OtherMuzz

--

yep!

31 May 15:44

Mechanizoid

--

Most of the scientific reporting out there is total garbage, just clickbait and hype.

31 May 15:44

OtherMuzz

--

like the paper i gave to artur has almost 2000 citings

31 May 15:44

OtherMuzz

--

so usually the top results are going to be pretty good

31 May 15:44

OtherMuzz

--

Luckily google scholar ranks results based on citings

31 May 15:43

OtherMuzz

--

yep exactly

31 May 15:43

Mechanizoid

--

Now maybe this is a bit of a stereotype (I certainly don't fit into this), but most of the time artists aren't too scientific reports and the like, they like images and ideas more.

31 May 15:43

Fedodika

--

based on research near the bottom of that pyramid

31 May 15:43

Fedodika

--

or even logic to begin with, articles you see on social media are mostly clickbait

31 May 15:42

Fedodika

--

only a tiiiiiiny fragment of the population knows about this http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-35nmTIcd-VU/TY...Levels.gif

31 May 15:42

Mechanizoid

--

@OtherMuzz I agree, I read a lot of scientific papers on the subjects that interest me. It's just that most artists don't like to read. LOL

31 May 15:41

OtherMuzz

--

Like there is almost always a science paper to do with some idea you have, and if you read it, it'll give you a better understanding.... but people don't do it