07-01-2016, 12:12 PM
Hey Im back.
Did some accuracy and form construction stuff and still lives while I was gone, also finished the dwarf illustration.
Im happy with how it turned out, but my ambitions lie much higher :D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22cb8/22cb82be128452529015730eea171f2941d98ca2" alt="Filename: dwarf!f.jpg
Size: 213.29 KB07-01-2016, 12:11 PM"
Another thing I did was to do an accurate copy of a photo and then dissect and try to understand forms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01cf8/01cf817978ff0f87574df8477fe67507a63e73ce" alt="Filename: construction-5.jpg
Size: 113.16 KB07-01-2016, 12:25 PM"
On this exercise I drew a basic front and site orthopetic view of the basic masses and then used the distort tool to place them in the perspective. after that I tried to draw the figure base on those 2 views. Then I added some other figures without the ortho guides to test my knowledge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a93d/7a93d3b5ded07892a04208ba4dff55b4eaa625a7" alt="Filename: construction-8.jpg
Size: 195.13 KB07-01-2016, 12:29 PM"
And finally one of the accuracy studies, lately Im using a 4 or 6 grid system to check for accuracy and a photo underlay aswell. I start with no guides, then turn on the grid to check for mistakes, try to fix them and measure by hand a bit. Eventually I turn on the photo underlay and check the mistakes that way. Rinse and repeat, this requires quite a bit of persistance to get right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21745/21745e933b708ca632efd0bc56fe0ebee101dc2d" alt="Filename: accuracy-12.jpg
Size: 167.48 KB07-01-2016, 12:31 PM"
Did some accuracy and form construction stuff and still lives while I was gone, also finished the dwarf illustration.
Im happy with how it turned out, but my ambitions lie much higher :D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22cb8/22cb82be128452529015730eea171f2941d98ca2" alt="Filename: dwarf!f.jpg
Size: 213.29 KB07-01-2016, 12:11 PM"
Another thing I did was to do an accurate copy of a photo and then dissect and try to understand forms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01cf8/01cf817978ff0f87574df8477fe67507a63e73ce" alt="Filename: construction-5.jpg
Size: 113.16 KB07-01-2016, 12:25 PM"
On this exercise I drew a basic front and site orthopetic view of the basic masses and then used the distort tool to place them in the perspective. after that I tried to draw the figure base on those 2 views. Then I added some other figures without the ortho guides to test my knowledge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a93d/7a93d3b5ded07892a04208ba4dff55b4eaa625a7" alt="Filename: construction-8.jpg
Size: 195.13 KB07-01-2016, 12:29 PM"
And finally one of the accuracy studies, lately Im using a 4 or 6 grid system to check for accuracy and a photo underlay aswell. I start with no guides, then turn on the grid to check for mistakes, try to fix them and measure by hand a bit. Eventually I turn on the photo underlay and check the mistakes that way. Rinse and repeat, this requires quite a bit of persistance to get right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21745/21745e933b708ca632efd0bc56fe0ebee101dc2d" alt="Filename: accuracy-12.jpg
Size: 167.48 KB07-01-2016, 12:31 PM"