02-05-2014, 09:20 PM
I'm still not sure what the point of critiquing studies are to be honest. Studies are for you to learn from. If you nailed the original identically, but didn't learn much does that make it a good study? If it is the most horrible piece of crap ever to grace a screen, but you learned heaps, does that make it a bad study?
Sorry I don't have anything much more constructive to say especially not having the originals to compare against, but I think you will benefit from getting critique of personal work more than studies, for the most part. I can see you have some issues with volume, and using only hard edges for most of the marks on the page. Parhaps try working in tones or value blocks more than detail line shading for large areas? You would definitely benefit from targeted fabric and drapery study as well as anatomy.
Sorry I don't have anything much more constructive to say especially not having the originals to compare against, but I think you will benefit from getting critique of personal work more than studies, for the most part. I can see you have some issues with volume, and using only hard edges for most of the marks on the page. Parhaps try working in tones or value blocks more than detail line shading for large areas? You would definitely benefit from targeted fabric and drapery study as well as anatomy.