06-29-2015, 07:04 AM
Yeah Denis, faceboom is a bad example to use for meaningful interaction, though it could happen on there as well f people weren't such lazy asses, but euchhh that like button.
@zombiechinchilla, I totally get that people feel obligated to reciprocate good deeds done for them to the person who did it, that happens quite frequently in life. What I was thinking was to go a lot further than a "you scratch my back" mentality and take it a step further and help out one other person who maybe wasn't simply returning a favour out of obligation. So maybe it should be a 1:2 ratio.
If you get a good crit, return the favour, then help one other random out as well. :)
You won't get an upsurge in less selfishness overall with a 1:1 ratio, if you are starting in a deficit to begin with. If it's 1:2 take to give, then everyone will start to feel that, not just the ones interacting. I can honestly say my ratio is more like 1:100. It isn't that hard to do 1:2.
@zombiechinchilla, I totally get that people feel obligated to reciprocate good deeds done for them to the person who did it, that happens quite frequently in life. What I was thinking was to go a lot further than a "you scratch my back" mentality and take it a step further and help out one other person who maybe wasn't simply returning a favour out of obligation. So maybe it should be a 1:2 ratio.
If you get a good crit, return the favour, then help one other random out as well. :)
You won't get an upsurge in less selfishness overall with a 1:1 ratio, if you are starting in a deficit to begin with. If it's 1:2 take to give, then everyone will start to feel that, not just the ones interacting. I can honestly say my ratio is more like 1:100. It isn't that hard to do 1:2.