06-17-2016, 05:39 AM
Hmm..
EDIT: Forgot to mention, the minor axises (axi? axes?) for each ellipse should go though the center of both ellipses! The 2nd image didn't illustrate that, ergo, not a cylinder! (Or at least not a cylinder with a circular face)
EDIT 2: As far as I know, in a two point perspective, any four sided shape with at least two lines parallel to each other can be considered as a perfect square. Of course, you can go to the extreme of making one parallel line a 100 feet and 10 cm with the other. I can still say it can be considered a perfect square in perspective, but a horribly distorted perfect square in perspective.
EDIT 3: Scratch my second edit! If you can fit an ellipse in a trapezoid, then it can be considered as a square in perspective.
EDIT: Forgot to mention, the minor axises (axi? axes?) for each ellipse should go though the center of both ellipses! The 2nd image didn't illustrate that, ergo, not a cylinder! (Or at least not a cylinder with a circular face)
EDIT 2: As far as I know, in a two point perspective, any four sided shape with at least two lines parallel to each other can be considered as a perfect square. Of course, you can go to the extreme of making one parallel line a 100 feet and 10 cm with the other. I can still say it can be considered a perfect square in perspective, but a horribly distorted perfect square in perspective.
EDIT 3: Scratch my second edit! If you can fit an ellipse in a trapezoid, then it can be considered as a square in perspective.
If you are reading this, I most likely just gave you a crappy crit! What I'm basically trying to say is, don't give up!
----
IG: @thatpuddinhead
----
IG: @thatpuddinhead