07-28-2024, 01:24 AM
You don't have to approach thing so linearly even if i advise for a more clean approch to structure for beginner i don't think you need as much structure you are progressing at a good rate in perspective which show you should probably also mix in value and light for added complexity but that surely will result in more challenge it depend how difficult you felt those exercise were. You can do some scott robertson but are you ready to hit a wall? Generally a slow and steady approach avoid gap in the theory. Drawing a lot is always advise but drawing does not necessary result in better drawing it the balancing of understand the rule you play by will doing what ever you have to do and the drawing give you the feedback if you have the eye to catch yourself slipping on some fundamental with a refresh eye in the aftermath.
Let me give a quick example if you were into abstract paint perspective would have little to no appeal.
The artists who deal with abstraction abandons perspective, scale and other mimetic techniques to focus on essential elements that trigger felt responses over-identification in art abandons perspective.
You have to realize like a bit like a character creation in a video game that it not a bad idea to give yourself a idea of how much point you want to invest in different fundamental and you also have to account that as you learn you might develop new taste as you understand the interaction on those ''fundamental'' let say you would invest heavy in learning value but would avoid dealing with perspective you would be limited in your understanding of how to cast a proper shadow just to name that principle.
It important i believe to have a bird eye view of what you want to achieve visually speaking and i think you did not do that yet at least not that i am aware of. If you don't have a general direction you will be a master of none as they say. Were strongest fundamental often make the signature of were art style.
Let me give a quick example if you were into abstract paint perspective would have little to no appeal.
The artists who deal with abstraction abandons perspective, scale and other mimetic techniques to focus on essential elements that trigger felt responses over-identification in art abandons perspective.
You have to realize like a bit like a character creation in a video game that it not a bad idea to give yourself a idea of how much point you want to invest in different fundamental and you also have to account that as you learn you might develop new taste as you understand the interaction on those ''fundamental'' let say you would invest heavy in learning value but would avoid dealing with perspective you would be limited in your understanding of how to cast a proper shadow just to name that principle.
It important i believe to have a bird eye view of what you want to achieve visually speaking and i think you did not do that yet at least not that i am aware of. If you don't have a general direction you will be a master of none as they say. Were strongest fundamental often make the signature of were art style.