12-03-2013, 11:58 AM
I was ready James Gurneys book on lighting.
It kind of makes me feel justified in making this as i actually feel like it justifies my thoughts that a no nonsense light and colour tutorial needs to exist.
Even though the book is lovely and is covered in insights and is for the most part scientifically accurate, i don't understand why first principles are presented as different areas. For example why is light filtering a different subject than atmospheric perspective? They are exactly the same thing, just different examples of it in the real world.
I think this is a big project to take on, and to make it as good as i want it to be it's going to need a lot of revision as well as i need to step up my game on the art side of things to prove i know what i am talking about.
It kind of makes me feel justified in making this as i actually feel like it justifies my thoughts that a no nonsense light and colour tutorial needs to exist.
Even though the book is lovely and is covered in insights and is for the most part scientifically accurate, i don't understand why first principles are presented as different areas. For example why is light filtering a different subject than atmospheric perspective? They are exactly the same thing, just different examples of it in the real world.
I think this is a big project to take on, and to make it as good as i want it to be it's going to need a lot of revision as well as i need to step up my game on the art side of things to prove i know what i am talking about.
Drawing out of perspective is like singing out of tune. I'll throw a shoe at you if you do it.
Sketch Book
Sketch Book