04-03-2013, 11:59 AM
i should mention that the way we had planned on doing it before we took a long break was that every 4th bloodsport would serve as a sort of 'midterm exam' for how much you learned in the 6 weeks leading up to them. we could make them even less frequent if people like, and treat them like events. tests, if you will, for how much better youve become in set intervals of time.
the idea was that the studies you did in the three leading up would fall under the umbrella of the 4th, so it would be that much better.
@sire- i appreciate the feedback. as to the second suggestion, separating people into years of experience is a false qualifier. some people work harder and achieve more in one year than other people do in 10. there are huge pros from the 80s who cant get work today, and at the same time 19 year old nobodies making tons of cash working on big games. it comes down to personal drive and ambition, not experience. the other side of that is the foundations of a tier system based on years working, which is something daggers is against. this is a level playing field and we never want people to feel 'less' than anyone else.
keep tellin me how you all feel! good stuff.
the idea was that the studies you did in the three leading up would fall under the umbrella of the 4th, so it would be that much better.
@sire- i appreciate the feedback. as to the second suggestion, separating people into years of experience is a false qualifier. some people work harder and achieve more in one year than other people do in 10. there are huge pros from the 80s who cant get work today, and at the same time 19 year old nobodies making tons of cash working on big games. it comes down to personal drive and ambition, not experience. the other side of that is the foundations of a tier system based on years working, which is something daggers is against. this is a level playing field and we never want people to feel 'less' than anyone else.
keep tellin me how you all feel! good stuff.