06-21-2016, 02:07 AM
@OtherMuzz
Will definitely revisit loomis again. And you're correct that I have just been eyeballing the perspective, but seeing of my current limitations of what materials I can get, probably one way I can check if perpsective is correct is scan it in, lay in the perspective grid lines on pc, and use dorian technique to check if the angles are actually correct or not on paper.
Thank You for the critique. And dang for not receiving brownie points :(!
@John
Well the end goal is definitely to have a system I can use out of my head to construct the figure without the model. The pose you picked was done from imagination, but I haven't thought of checking proportions when I am done with the figure, rather I was just checking things off of whether it feels wrong/right. Will revisit Loomis/Hampton/Bridgman to check how they each check proportions for different angles.
Did see Bridgman has something pretty cool to do that. Thank you for the critique !
Will definitely revisit loomis again. And you're correct that I have just been eyeballing the perspective, but seeing of my current limitations of what materials I can get, probably one way I can check if perpsective is correct is scan it in, lay in the perspective grid lines on pc, and use dorian technique to check if the angles are actually correct or not on paper.
Thank You for the critique. And dang for not receiving brownie points :(!
@John
Well the end goal is definitely to have a system I can use out of my head to construct the figure without the model. The pose you picked was done from imagination, but I haven't thought of checking proportions when I am done with the figure, rather I was just checking things off of whether it feels wrong/right. Will revisit Loomis/Hampton/Bridgman to check how they each check proportions for different angles.
Did see Bridgman has something pretty cool to do that. Thank you for the critique !
▲ SKETCHBOOK ▲ WEBSITE▲