Mutley's Sketchbook

[darktiste]

For me i think on number 4 you just need to find way to to make appealing group shadow that indicate your vegetation texture and create flow as well as a few stroke that indicate the texture pattern.Right now i would say it bit to flat,Implying something with color help read so does the silouette but if your picture is 70% vegetation in the foreground with the same level of inner detail as the midground your not separating the two as much as you could but there still enough atmospheric perspective to let me know they are not on the same distance from the viewer so you already have that.


N.1 is the most unfinish perhaps but it also the first one so i guess you just perhaps need to warm up before those.
N.2 There bit to many rock think about simplification to help the flow
N.3 The Color of the water it like there algua on top but it doesn't read clearly as that if that what those color are for
N.4 I already gave most of my comment at the beggining of this post
N.5 I feel like those shadow aren't working but i don't know what could be improve about them exactly.
N.6 It feel ok but if feel tame overall.
N7 I like the blur on the foreground my only issue is the sky look like the sea it hard to tell if it the sky
or the land or the sea
N.8 Nothing in particular strike me here i think you should try do more desert piece to play with dirt color.
N.9 This one strike me as the most complete it as a focal point the color are nice the lighting also is interesting.I think the selling point here is there no blue sky boring sky.

As parting word i think trying to play with different moment of the day would add additonal interest specially in your sky color.

Hope you don't mind this heavy handed style of critic it all with good intention.