05-30-2013, 08:13 AM
hey
i will try commenting your last work..( i m not used to..sorry if it sounds lame)
you can add foreground element trees, foliages to create more mysterious to the 'door'. Architecturally speaking, the proportion of the doors should be reversed , bigger height to the bottom to stabilize the door/passage aspect. Here we may feel than there is a piece inside in the first floor and your door more looks like a balconry . But since you put a bridge connecting the two sides i don't see this kind of architecture but more like a frontal door for an underground passage.
The two curvy things besides the main things are tilting a little bit and appear to not being in the same perspective to the rest of your image. i don't think they serve the composition a lot.
The foreground right part should be darker to create more differences and physical spaces between the door ( if it is one :) )and the foreground. We have to feel the gap you have created .Curiously here the focal point is more on the bridge than the door. ( composition and color values).
Personnally ( here it is not objective any more) i will make the door bigger. Put the view more on the ground (may be eye level ) to add more drama. add more haze everywhere to the other side but some parts of the red elements. And because i love architecture, suggest more details to reinforce the focal point to your architectural element ( is it a passage door ? :p ).
The point of view and the scale of things don't really help you to create precise interest. It looks like you have two pictures in one. To the left a great green landcape to the left another thing.. Using an isometric view is certainly efficient to expose an overall view of one environmnent but i don't think it s good for what you want to express here ( a road ending under a giant door getting underground somewhere..)
sorry for my english , i can make an overpaint but i don't really think confident commenting someone's else work .. i hope it helps though .
good thread btw !
i will try commenting your last work..( i m not used to..sorry if it sounds lame)
you can add foreground element trees, foliages to create more mysterious to the 'door'. Architecturally speaking, the proportion of the doors should be reversed , bigger height to the bottom to stabilize the door/passage aspect. Here we may feel than there is a piece inside in the first floor and your door more looks like a balconry . But since you put a bridge connecting the two sides i don't see this kind of architecture but more like a frontal door for an underground passage.
The two curvy things besides the main things are tilting a little bit and appear to not being in the same perspective to the rest of your image. i don't think they serve the composition a lot.
The foreground right part should be darker to create more differences and physical spaces between the door ( if it is one :) )and the foreground. We have to feel the gap you have created .Curiously here the focal point is more on the bridge than the door. ( composition and color values).
Personnally ( here it is not objective any more) i will make the door bigger. Put the view more on the ground (may be eye level ) to add more drama. add more haze everywhere to the other side but some parts of the red elements. And because i love architecture, suggest more details to reinforce the focal point to your architectural element ( is it a passage door ? :p ).
The point of view and the scale of things don't really help you to create precise interest. It looks like you have two pictures in one. To the left a great green landcape to the left another thing.. Using an isometric view is certainly efficient to expose an overall view of one environmnent but i don't think it s good for what you want to express here ( a road ending under a giant door getting underground somewhere..)
sorry for my english , i can make an overpaint but i don't really think confident commenting someone's else work .. i hope it helps though .
good thread btw !